Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 F.3d 21 - Okonkwo v. Lacy

Okonkwo v. Lacy’s Empirical Analysis

104 F.3d 21 · 1997

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
March 2014
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2014

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

80199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Waller v. Georgia · People v. Hinton · Ayala v. Speckard · Spectrum Systems International Corp. v. Chemical Bank · Ayala v. Speckard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To hold otherwise would establish a rule that, despite the Sixth Amendment, no undercover officer who intends to return to undercover work need testify in open court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “exposed to the community in the area where [he] would operate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.