Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

104 F.3d 359

Docket No. 96-1928.

Morgan v. Willoughby

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Dec. 19, 1996. Decided Dec. 30, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-12-30

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on McLamb v. Morris

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-12-30

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-64-5-BR)

Robert Lewis Morgan, Appellant Pro Se.

Floyd Matthew Lewis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Dorothy Kibler Woodard, CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Michael R. Ferrell, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Morgan v. Willoughby, No. CA-96-64-5-BR (E.D.N.C. June 10, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/104/f3d/359 · .json · Public domain