Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

104 F.3d 360

Docket No. 96-7247.

Freddy L. Wambach v. Charles M. Creecy, Jr. Gary Dixon Doctor Shah Ms. Lowney

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Dec. 10, 1996. Decided Dec. 24, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-12-24

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Little

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-12-24

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-545-BR)

Freddy L. Wambach, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wambach v. Creecy, No. CA-96-545-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/104/f3d/360 · .json · Public domain