Lockhart v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
104 F.3d 54 · 1997
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Trevino v. Johnson (1999), Bigby v. Dretke (2005)
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Illinois v. Allen · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Solventes Y Quimica de Nicaragua, S.A. Solquimisa v. Weaver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“adjudicated on the merits in state court proceedings.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“contrary to ... clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court.” The second clause, on the other hand, applies when a mixed question of law and fact is under consideration: a federal court may grant habeas relief only if it determines that the state court decision rested on”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“pure questions of law and mixed questions of law and fact are reviewed under ' 2254(d)(1), and questions of fact are reviewed under ' 2254(d)(2)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.