Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 F.3d 782 - Roberts v. Energy Development Corp.

Roberts v. Energy Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

104 F.3d 782 · 1997

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2024

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1001997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Granito v. United States · Granito v. United States · Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Transportation Insurance · Union Texas Petroleum Corporation v. Plt Engineering Inc Power Well Service Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “compressor facilities, separators, gauging installations, treatment plants, etc.; (9) who owns and operates the facility or structure in question, and who owns and operates the well or wells that produce the gas in question; (10) and any number of other details affecting the functional and geographic nexus between Aa well”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'agreement' as it pertains to a well for oil, gas, or water . . . . means any agreement or understanding . . . concerning any operations related to the exploration, development, or production, or transportation of oil, gas, or water . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an issue of conventional obligation is governed by the law of the state whose policies would be most seriously impaired if its law were not applied to that issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.