United States v. Redding’s Empirical Analysis
104 F.3d 96 · 1996
Citation profile
25 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably United States v. Staples (2000), United States v. Anderson (2010)
25 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on United States v. Olano · Bunce v. United States · Bird v. United States · Scott v. United States · Durrive v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“local ordinance violations that are also criminal offenses under state law are counted in computing a defendant's criminal history score.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]t present, we accept for the purposes of this sentencing hearing the calculations regarding criminal history, although I believe that does not bind [the defendant] from possible collateral attack regarding these matters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.