United States v. Terrones

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 18, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-08-18

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2005

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-08-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:*

¶1Court-appointed counsel representing Jose Rodolfo Terrones has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to An-ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ter-rones has not filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no non-frivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

¶2 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.