Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 Fla. 427 - Drew v. Hobbs

Drew v. Hobbs’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
May 1989
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 1989 · most notably 450 So. 2d 1114 - Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. Sykes (1984), 68 So. 2d 163 - Donahue v. Davis (1953)

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

90193219401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Saunders v. McDonough · Proctor v. Hearne · O. K. Boiler & Welding Co. v. Minnetonka Lumber Co. · Brett v. First National Bank of Marianna · Blount Bros. Realty Co. v. Eilenberger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The memorandum of trust agreement dated November 14, 1925, between Frederick E. Lewis, trustee, and John H. Drew, recites that the parties executing same had jointly purchased certain real estate therein described, and that, for their convenience in handling, selling, and disposing thereof, the title thereto had been taken in the name of Lewis, as trustee, upon condition that both the purchasers should share equally in any and all net proceeds received from the sale of the land according to their pro rata interest in same. [[Image here]] In this case the court would have .been warranted in deciding as a matter of law that a joint adventure existed between the defendant, John H. Drew, and Frederick E. Lewis in the specific venture for profit jointly sought by them without actual partnership or corporate designation in the purchase of the lands described in the memorandum of trust agreement hereinbefore referred to.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an agreement among two or more to purchase specific property for speculation or resale at a profit is a joint adventure”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.