Tatterson v. Koppers Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2005
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 362 F. Supp. 1005 - Yonofsky v. Wernick · Staggers v. Otto Gerdau Co. · United States v. Miller Bros. Construction Co. · National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Whitecraft Unlimited, Inc. · Anderson v. Republic Motor Inns, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless the motion for substitution is made not later than 90 days after the death is suggested upon the record ... the action shall be dismissed as to the deceased party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he history of Rule 25(a) and Rule 6(b) makes it clear that the 90 day time period was not intended to act as a bar to otherwise meritorious actions, and extensions of the period may be liberally granted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“allows the Court in its discretion to permit a motion for substitution after the expiration of the 90 day time period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.