Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 FSUPP 973 - Kelly v. Bowman

Kelly v. Bowman’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1987
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1987

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

301952196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. Armstrong · Higginson v. Treasurer & School House Commissioners · Brandies v. Cochrane · Floyd v. . Carow · Murphy v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Section 151 provides and limits the taking of lands for the purpose of a schoolhouse site. There is no intention expressed by the legislature in this Act for the school district to obtain a fee simple title. It is quite clear that the Legislature intended that the Trustees were to exercise their rights of eminent domain in obtaining the school site for school purposes only."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘The site 0 0 0 shall be the school house site for such district; and said district shall have the right to take the same for the purpose of a school house site either with or without the owner’s consent by condemnation or otherwise.’ ” 104 F. Supp. 973, 974 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.