Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 F. Supp. 3d 149 - Doe v. Backpage.com, LLC

104 F. Supp. 3d 149 - Doe v. Backpage.com, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
January 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 17 U.S.C. § 412 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 504 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1595 · 28 U.S.C. § 4102 · 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Hunter v. Bryant · Keene Corp. v. United States · Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) Protection for “Good Samaritan” blocking and screening of offensive material (1) Treatment of publisher or speaker No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content'provider. .(2) Civil liability No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of— (A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy,.excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or (B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in [subparagraph (A)]. •”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Any person whose name, portrait, or picture is used within the state for commercial purposes without his or her written consent may bring an. action ... against the person so using his or her name, portrait, or picture to prevent and restrain the use thereof, and may recover damages for any injuries sustained-by reason of such use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.