104 F. Supp. 3d 86 - Crooks v. Mabus’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 2031 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Goldberg v. Kelly · Califano v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“upon consideration of the conduct, performance, and evaluations of an SNSI/ NSI by the school and/or designated inspectors, [the Chief of Naval Education & Training] determines that continued certification of the instructor is not in the best interests of the program.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crooks v. Mabus“Dickinson v. Zurko , 527 U.S. 150 , 164, 119 S.Ct. 1816 , 144 L.Ed.2d 143 (1999) ; see also Kaufman v. Perez , 745 F.3d 521 , 527 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (noting that agency factual findings may be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Iaccarino v. Duke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.