State v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
95 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably State v. Hedger (1989), State v. Decker (1985)
95 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Barker v. Wingo · Chimel v. California · Payton v. New York · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“precluded from substituting our judgment for that of the jury as to the credibility of witnesses, the weight of the testimony, and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence[,]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Maxfield · State v. Garza“As a general rule in criminal proceedings, an exhibit must be shown to be in substantially the same condition when offered into evidence as it was when the crime was committed. However, the party offering the exhibit need not exclude all possibility of tampering____ Ordinarily, the party offering an exhibit establishes its chain of custody in order to create a presumption that it was not materially altered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wilson“refers to a number of errors which prejudice defendant's right to a fair trial. State v. McKenzie, 186 Mont. 481, 514 , 608 P.2d 428, 448 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1050 , 101 S.Ct. 626 , 66 L.Ed.2d 507 (1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Missamore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.