majority">Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case, after several preliminary bills had been filed, an amended and supplemental bill was filed by leave of court by Karl O. Hofman, and others, on behalf of themselves and all others of Bella Bona Lodge Ho. 700. The bill alleges that this lodge was and is a voluntary unincorporated association; Conrad Bachman and Joseph Biehl, and others, were made parties defendant thereto.

Upon the hearing it appeared that prior to Hovember 22, 1899, a majority of the members of Bella Dona Lodge had arranged to withdraw therefrom and form a new lodge, known as Bella Dona Lodge Humber 14, of the German-American Federation. That as Bella Dona Lodge of the Knights and Ladies of Honor, with which, prior to Hovember 22d, they were connected, had in its treasury about some $700 in money, a plan was devised for obtaining this money and transferring it to the new lodge to be formed, for the benefit of the persons who might become members of said new lodge.

In accordance with such scheme Conrad Bachman and Joseph Biehl, at a meeting of said Bella Dona Lodge of the Knights and Ladies of Honor, held Hovember 22, 1889, presented the following bills:

“ Chicago, 11, 22, ’99.

To the Oeeioers and Members of the Bella Dona Lodge, 700, Knights and Ladies of Honor.

Members : In that I have tor nine years been treasurer, and have had running expenses, therefore I hereby submit my bill for nine years’ service at $45.00 per annum, making $405.00. Please allow the same.

Conrad Bachman.”

“ Chicago, 11, 22, ’99.

To the Officers and Members of the Bella Dona Lodge, No. 700, Knights and Ladies of Honor.

Members: In that for nine and one-half years I have been special-fund treasurer, and have had much labor and costs, therefore I hereby submit my bill for nine and a half years’ services at $30.00 per annum, making $285.00, and pray that you allow said sum.

Joseph Biehl.”

And thereupon a motion to pay said bills was put and carried, and such bills were ordered to be paid. It also appeared that such action had been for some time contemplated and arranged; that at this time, of the funds of the lodge, $500 was invested in a mortgage; that an arrangement had been made to have said mortgage paid; a check for $500, very shortly after such meeting of November, apparently upon the same evening, was given to the lodge, the money received thereon, and turned over to the treasurer, who, after the payment to him of this $500, and before these bills were paid, had in his hands, as treasurer, the sum of $684.39.

In accordance with the order of the lodge the sum of $405 was paid to Bachman, and the sum of $279.39 to Biehl. It also appeared that in November, 1899, the lodge had 108 members; that the greater portion—eighty-four members—of the Bella Dona Lodge did not pay the November or December, 1899, assessment, and united with Bella Dona Lodge, No. 14, German-American Federation.

Thereafter Joseph Biehl, as ne says, loaned Bella Dona Lodge No. 14 of the German-American Federation, $278.39, and Conrad Bachman loaned the same lodge $303.43, at a time when he says such lodge was indebted to him in over $100 for several small bills, to buy charter, etc. The sums of money thus loaned by Bachman and Biehl amount to $681.82, very nearly equaling the funds possessed by Bella Dona Lodge of the Knights and Ladies of Honor before the payment to Bachman and Biehl. The court found “ that the sum of $684.39 in the treasury of Bella Dona Lodge of the Knights and Ladies of Honor was a general fund for purposes in connection with the objects of the lodge and order.” That it was the intention of Bachman, Biehl, Kominsky, Grepling and Sievert to divert the sum of $684.39 to another lodge; and ordered'that the defendants Conrad Bachman, Joseph Biehl, Ferdinand Kominski, Otto Grepling and Fritz John Sievert pay to the financial secretary of Bella Dona Lodge No. 700, the sum of $684.39.

Counsel for appellant in his brief says :

“We are aware that this suit was instituted on the theory, and the decree of the court no doubt was rendered on the same theory, that the defendants Bachman and Biehl rendered their bills for the purpose of depleting the treasury of Bella Dona Lodge and using the money for the purpose of organizing a new society. But such a theory, in our opinion, should not enter into the consideration of this case; for what was done 'with the money, or for what it was intended, makes no difference, so long as the voting of it was proper and legal, and this we contend was the case in this matter.”

If the sums ordered to be paid to Bachman and Biehl were justly due them, a majority of the lodge could properly order such payment to be made, and that action upon the part of the lodge would bind all members thereto. The funds of a lodge or association of individuals mayL in good faith be applied to any purpose for which the order exists and in accordance with the object for which the fund was created. Belonging, as the funds of such an organization do, to all the members, they can not by a mere majority, however large, be applied to a purpose foreign to that for which the order exists or the fund was created.

The question presented in this case is not whether the lodge was indebted to Bachman and Biehl to the amounts respectively ordered to be paid to them, but was the action of the lodge in ordering the payment it did, made in good faith, for the purpose of discharging an obligation of the lodge and with a view to promote its interests by satisfying a debt, or was this action with a view, by a subterfuge, to withdraw the funds of the lodge and place them in another organization for the benefit of such persons as might become members thereof. If the action of the lodge was not in good faith for the benefit of all the members of the organization, but was intended to be for the benefit of such persons as might see fit to become members of another organization, then this action was unwarranted, not binding, and the parties who received the money under such circumstances, knowing of such purpose and intent, may be compelled by a court of equity to restore that which they have inequitably received; all the parties participating in such inequitable and unlawful proceeding will be, by a court of equity, held responsible to a lodge thus defrauded, fof all that by such means was obtained therefrom.

The court in this proceeding will not scan closely to determine whether the amounts respectively ordered to be paid to Bachman and Biehl were actually due to them. The action of a lodge in such a case, if made in good faith, will undoubtedly have great weight in determining as to whether such amounts honestly claimed and honestly ordered paid, were actually due, but in the present case it appears that the order of payment was made, not for the - benefit of the lodge to which the money belonged, but for the benefit of another organization thereafter to be created, or such persons as might become members thereof. Such purpose was entirely foreign to Bella Dona Lodge of the Knights and Ladies of Honor, and one for which its funds could not be appropriated as against the wish of one of its members.

The proceeding in this case was not an attempt to divide equally among the members of the old organization such funds as it had, but to apply them to the purpose of another organization, and to place them in a position where none of the members of the lodge to which these funds belonged could have any benefit therefrom, unless they became members of the new organization.

The principles applicable to the use, care, transfer and payment of the property of an organization of this kind are well stated in Gorman v. O’Connor, 155 Pa. State, 239; Abels v. McKeen, 18 N. J. Eq. 462; Bacon on Benefit Societies, 2d Ed., Sec. 65; McFadden v. Murphy, 21 N. E. Rep. 868.

The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed.

Citation profile

Relationships

How this case has been treated — in progress