Custer v. Royse’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1941
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Buoy v. Clyde Milling & Elevator Co. · Hartwell v. Equitable Manufacturing Co. · State ex rel. McGill v. Gerhards · Rogers v. Hodgson · Hoffmeier v. Kansas City-Leavenworth Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule is that a demurrer to the defendant’s evidence should not be sustained unless there is an entire absence of proof tending to show a right to recover. (Brown v. Cruse, 90 Kan. 306 , 133 Pac. 865 .) Such demurrer admits every fact and conclusion which the evidence most favorable to the other party tends to prove. (Christie v. Barnes, 33 Kan. 317 , 6 Pac. 599 .) And it admits not only the truth of the facts directly proven, but also all that may properly be inferred from those facts. (City of Syracuse v. Reed, 46 Kan. 520 , 26 Pac. 1040 .) The court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and allow all reasonable inferences in his favor.” (p. 856.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.