Steele v. Stevenson’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1988
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McCormick v. McCormick · Stahl v. Stevenson · Manley v. Park · Chicago, Kansas & Western Railroad v. Board of Commissioners · Board of Commissioners v. Welch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The doctrine of res judicata applies not only to the questions brought forward by the defendants in their testimony, but also as to every question open to consideration as a part of the subject of litigation and which could have been presented at that time. (C. K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Comm’rs of Anderson Co., 47 Kan. 766 , 29 Pac. 96 ; Manley v. Park, 62 Kan. 553 , 64 Pac. 43 ; McCormick v. McCormick, 82 Kan. 31 , 107 Pac. 546 ; Hubbard v. Power Co., 89 Kan. 446 , 131 Pac. 1182 .)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.