Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 KY 106 - Vinegar v. Commonwealth

Vinegar v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
December 1955
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 1955 · most notably People v. Townsend (1921), Arnold v. Commonwealth (1922)

36 state decisions

1201898190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Hourigan · Paducah & Elizabethtown R. R. v. Commonwealth · Blyew v. Commonwealth · Redmon v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule was universal at common law that the allegation of time in an indictment was immaterial, except where the time of the commission of the act formed an ingredient of the offense, as in the case of Sunday offenses.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.