104 N.C. 331
10 S.E 518
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1889
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1889-09-05
<p>The Supreme Court; will not consider exceptions where no assignment of error has been properly made below.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1898
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1889-09-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The argument of the plaintiff’s counsel was addressed to the general character of his Honor’s charge in reference to negligence. We regret that we are precluded from passing upon that question. There is not only a failure to assign error (see McKinnon v. Morrison and Carlton v. R. R. Co., at this term), but the case expressly states that the instructions given were not excepted to.
¶2 The judgment, therefore, must be Affirmed.