104 N.C. App. 226 - State v. Hardy’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2010
5 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penalty · Flick v. United States · State v. Brown · State v. Etheridge · State v. Witherspoon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court has repeatedly noted that ‘a child’s uncertainty as to the time or particular day the offense charged was committed’ shall not be grounds for nonsuit ‘where there is sufficient evidence that the defendant committed each essential act of the offense.’ (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Quarg“An error is not prejudicial unless a different result would have been reached at the trial if the error in question had not been committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.