Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 NCAPP 732 - State v. Huntley

State v. Huntley’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. DeLeonardo · State v. Perry · State v. Higginbottom · State v. Sumpter · State v. Hicks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Mr. Williams]: And do you know the difference between telling the truth and not telling the truth? [Prosecutrix]: Tell the truth. Q: Do you know what a lie is? A: [No answer.] Q: If I said you were a boy, would that be the truth or not the truth? A: Not the truth? Q: And what happens — what does your mother do when you don’t tell the truth? A: [No answer.] Q: Do you know what happens if you don’t tell the truth? A: No. Q: Is it good to tell the truth? A: Yeah. Q: Are you going to tell the truth today? A: Yeah. Q: Do you promise to tell the truth about what happened, about what [defendant] did? A: Yeah.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.