Bostic v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dearman v. State · Williams v. State · Snow v. State · Konig v. Nevada-California-Oregon Railway · 133 Cal. App. 3d 330 - People v. Eagles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to prove the defendant guilty of Driving While Intoxicated, the State must prove: (1) That he drove or was in actual physical control of a vehicle; (2) Upon a highway or on premises to which the public has access; (3) While under the influence of intoxicating liquor or while having a 0.10 percent or more by weight of alcohol in his blood.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Long v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.