104 N.J. Super. 57 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2005
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Quercia v. United States · Starr v. United States · Boyd v. United States · State v. Begyn · State v. Guido
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Moreover, it is `obviously improper' to imply that police testimony should be accepted, `not because of its believability but because the witnesses were policemen.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“should be temperately and fairly made, and should not be argumentative or contentious to a degree which makes it characteristically an act of advocacy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the motion to suppress the evidence seized was properly denied, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the trial judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.