Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 N.M. 222 - State v. JULIA S.

State v. JULIA S.’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2015

10 state decisions

401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roe v. Wade · Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. · Samuel Gompers v. Buck's Stove & Range Company · Ex parte Grossman · State Ex Rel. Bliss v. Greenwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to provide judicial and other procedures through which the provisions of the Children's Code are executed and enforced and in which the parties are assured a fair hearing and their constitutional and other legal rights are recognized and enforced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to remove from children committing delinquent acts the adult consequences of criminal behavior, but to still hold children committing delinquent acts accountable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to provide for the care, protection and wholesome mental and physical development of children”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.