Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 N.M. 293 - Williams v. Amax Chemical Corp.

Williams v. Amax Chemical Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

2 district · 28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Vigil v. Arzola · Bottijliso v. Hutchison Fruit Co. · Pedrazza v. Sid Fleming Contractor, Inc. · Casias v. Zia Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the Vigil court determined that a cause of action should lie when the discharge of an employee contravenes some clear mandate of public policy, when an Act is sui generis, public policy, other than that reflected in the Act, is generally not to be invoked.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.