State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2022
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hurd · State v. Torres · 445 So. 2d 815 - House v. State · Johnson v. State · State v. Beachum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here, in addition to the overwhelming evidence that the hypnotic procedure was inept and ineffective, we have uncontro-verted testimony that no information of any kind was conveyed to, or elicited from, the child.... The evidence before the trial court provided a substantial basis for the trial court’s conclusion that the child's identification [of the defendant] was not a product of hypnosis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McGlauflin v. State“Our task is not to reweigh the evidence to determine whether the child was or was not hypnotized during the sessions, but only to determine whether the [trial] court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McGlauflin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.