Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 Ohio App. 3d 227 - Lable & Co. v. Flowers

104 Ohio App. 3d 227 - Lable & Co. v. Flowers’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably 128 Ohio App. 3d 226 - Burrell v. Kassicieh (1998), 167 Ohio App. 3d 301 - Orbit Electronics, Inc. v. Helm Instrument Co. (2006)

64 state decisions

2301995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 81 Ohio App. 3d 286 - Ceol v. Zion Industries, Inc. · Elek v. Huntington National Bank · 41 Ohio App. 3d 402 - Quintus v. McClure · 66 Ohio App. 3d 400 - Shaffer v. Mease · 82 Ohio App. 3d 363 - Tomb & Associates, Inc. v. Wagner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every pleading, motion, or other paper of a party represented by an attorney shall be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s individual name, whose address and attorney registration number, if any, shall be stated. * * * The signature of an attorney or pro se party constitutes a certificate by the attorney or party that the attorney or party has read the document; that to the best of the attorney’s or party’s knowledge, information, and belief there is good ground to support it; and that it is not interposed for delay. * * * For a willful violation of this rule an attorney or pro se party, upon motion of a party or upon the court’s own motion, may be subjected to appropriate action, including an award to the opposing party of expenses and reasonable attorney fees incurred in bringing any motion under this rule. * * *””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] determination * * * that conduct `is not warranted under existing law and cannot be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law,' requires a legal analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"The filing of a civil action, the assertion of a claim, defense or other position in connection with a civil action, or the taking of any other action in connection with a civil action."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.