Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 Ohio App. 3d 241 - State v. Mays

104 Ohio App. 3d 241 - State v. Mays’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably 117 Ohio App. 3d 124 - State v. Powers (1996), 216 W. Va. 23 - Hoover v. West Virginia Board of Medicine (2004)

25 state decisions

1201995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · State v. Adams · 89 Ill. 2d 171 - People v. Lippert · City of Toledo v. Reasonover · United States v. Wylie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]rror in the numerical designation or omission of the numerical designation shall not be ground for dismissal of the indictment or information, or for reversal of a conviction, if *Page 8 the error or omission did not prejudicially mislead the defendant,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the misnumbering of the ordinance in the complaint did not deprive the complaint of its essential purpose of notifying Mays of the offense with which he was charged[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “An unsigned complaint is merely a piece of paper. It does not acquire the essential characteristic of a written allegation of wrongdoing until [properly] sign[ed].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.