104 Ohio App. 3d 434 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Ketterer (2006), 128 Ohio App. 3d 419 - State v. Carter (1998)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Deal · 71 Ohio App. 3d 78 - State v. Prater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“allegations of ineffective assistance had to be 'specific, not vague or general'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Corder · State v. Corder“when `an indigent accused questions the effectiveness and adequacy of assigned counsel, * * * it is the duty of the trial judge to inquire into the complaint and make such inquiry a part of the record.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`inquiry may be brief and minimal, but it must be made.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.