Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 Ohio App. 3d 443 - State v. Hubbard

104 Ohio App. 3d 443 - State v. Hubbard’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Butcher · State v. MacDonald · 64 Ohio St. 3d 476 - State v. Brown · State v. Martin · 97 Ohio App. 3d 183 - State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the accused would remain incarcerated even after *Page 38 the pending charge was dropped, the (triple count) provision should not apply.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “held in jail in lieu of bail solely on the pending charge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “There is no `* * * constitutional requirement that the detainee be served with the underlying notice of the charge * * * [in] the parole holder situation.' * * * A probation violation is not dissimilar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.