104 Ohio App. 3d 448 - State v. Daws’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[i]f the trier of fact can understand the issues and the evidence and arrive at a correct determination, expert testimony is unnecessary and inadmissible.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Olivier v. Leaf Vine, Unpublished Decision (4-15-2005) · Wise v. Meyer, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006)

2. ““(B) Disclosure of evidence by the prosecuting attorney. “(1) Information subject to disclosure. “(a) Statement of defendant or co-defendant. Upon motion of the defendant, the court shall order the prosecuting attorney to permit the defendant to inspect and copy or photograph any of the following which are available to, or within the possession, custody, or control of the state, the existence of which is known or by the exercise of due diligence may become known to the prosecuting attorney: “(i) Relevant written or recorded statements made by the defendant or co-defendant, or copies thereof; “(ii) Written summaries of any oral statement, or copies thereof, made by the defendant or co-defendant to a prosecuting attorney or any law enforcement officer; “(in) Recorded testimony of the defendant or co-defendant before a grand jury.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 139 Ohio App. 3d 490 - State v. Glander

3. “Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable solely because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Wise v. Meyer, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006)