104 Ohio App. 3d 545 - Yaroma v. Griffiths’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Temple v. Wean United, Inc. · Mitseff v. Wheeler · Murphy v. City of Reynoldsburg · 87 Ohio App. 3d 704 - Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We therefore hold that when a party voluntarily places his signature upon a note or other writing within the Statute of Frauds, and where that party’s sole defense to an action brought upon the writing is that a different set of terms was orally agreed to at that time, such defense shall not be countenanced at law regardless of the theory under which such facts are pled. In such event, the writing alone shall be the sole repository of the terms of the agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.