104 Ohio App. 3d 768 - Hackathorn v. Preisse’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably 148 Ohio App. 3d 41 - Shalkhauser v. City of Medina (2002), 136 Ohio App. 3d 616 - Caruso v. State (2000)
49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Temple v. Wean United, Inc. · Thompson v. McNeill · 66 Ohio App. 3d 826 - Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · 76 Ohio App. 3d 448 - Jackson v. Butler County Board of County Commissioners · 102 Ohio App. 3d 130 - Piro v. Franklin Township
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`that he did not intend to cause any harm . . ., did not breach a known duty through an ulterior motive or ill will, [and] did not have a dishonest purpose. . . .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“refers to an act done with knowledge or reason to know of facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the conduct creates an unnecessary risk of physical harm and that such risk is greater than that necessary to make the conduct negligent. Hackathorn v. Preisse (1995), 104 Ohio App.3d 768, 771 , 663 N.E.2d 384, 386 , citing Thompson v. McNeill (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 102, 104-105 , 559 N.E.2d 705, 707-708 , citing 2 Restatement of the Law 2d, Torts (1965) 587, Section 500. The term”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he standard for showing that a political subdivision employee acted with malicious purpose, in bad faith, or in a wanton or reckless manner is 'rigorous' and 'will in most circumstances be difficult to establish.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.