104 Ohio App. 3d 826 - Paton v. Brill’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

17 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““A court of a State that has made a child support order consistently with this section has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over the order if the State is the child’s State or the residence of any contestant unless the court of another State, acting in accordance with subsection (e), has made a modification of the order.” 28 U.S.C. § 1738B(d).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State, Dept. of Revenue v. Fleet · Porter v. Porter

2. ““Any support order issued by a court of this state pursuant to sections 3115.01 to 3115.34, inclusive, of the Revised Code * * * is not nullified by a support order made by a court of this state pursuant to any other law or by a support order made by a court of any other state pursuant to a substantially similar act or any other law, regardless of priority of issuance, unless otherwise specifically provided by the court.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 116 Ohio App. 3d 46 - Bobbs v. Cline

3. “resulting in an increase in the amount of interstate travel and communication required to establish and collect on child support orders and a burden on custodial parents that is expensive, time consuming, and disruptive of occupations and commercial activity.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State, Dept. of Revenue v. Fleet