State v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably State v. Washington (2013), In Re A.G. (2016)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · State v. Logan · State v. Rance · State v. Powell · State v. Nicholas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a court need only engage in the allied-offense analysis when the same conduct, or single act, results in multiple convictions.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“'In addition to the requirement of similar import * * *, the defendant, in order to obtain the protection of R.C. 2941.25(A), must show that the prosecution has relied upon the same conduct to support both offenses charged.' "). (Emphasis added.) R.C. 2941.25(B) restates these requirements in the negative by prohibiting merger where the offenses are of "dissimilar import”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(A) where the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or more allied of offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one. {¶ 49} "(B) where the defendant's conduct constitutes two or more offenses of dissimilar import, or where his conduct results in two or more offenses of the same or similar kind committed separately or with a separate animus as to each, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, and the defendant may be convicted of all them.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.