State v. Crotts’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
186 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 188 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State v. Blankenburg (2012), 164 Ohio St. 3d 589 - State v. Worley (Slip Opinion) (2021)
186 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Smith · State v. Robb · Oberlin v. Akron General Medical Center · In Re Marriage of Huber · State v. Shedrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 188 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'If unfair prejudice simply meant prejudice, anything adverse to a litigant's case would be excludable under Rule 403. Emphasis must be placed on the word”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage“In any criminal case in which the defendant's motive or intent, the absence of mistake or accident on his part, or the defendant's scheme, plan, or system in doing an act is material, any acts of the defendant which tend to show his motive or intent, the absence of mistake or accident on his part, or the defendant's scheme, plan, or system in doing the act in question may be proved, whether they are contemporaneous with or prior or subsequent thereto, notwithstanding that such proof may show or tend to show the commission of another crime by the defendant.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“requires that the other act be 'like' or 'similar' to the crime charged, as long as the prior act tends to show one of the enumerated factors.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.