Sargent v. Foland’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 1958
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ellis v. Cary · Gill v. Staylor · Wilkes v. Cornelius · Branch v. Lambert · Disbrow v. Durand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * The statute does not prescribe any particular form for a claim presented against an estate. It is sufficient if the claim and affidavit show a substantial.subsisting liability in favor of the claimant and notifies the representative of the estate of the character and amount of the claim. The facts constituting the claim may be asserted in general terms and need not be stated with the particularity required in an action at law-: Wilkes v. Cornelius, 21 Or. 348, 350 ( 28 Pac. 135 ); Tharp v. Jackson, 85 Or. 78, 85 ( 165 Pac. 585, 1173 ); In re Andersen’s Estate, 101 Or. 94 ( 198 Pac. 236 , 238); Branch v. Lambert, 103 Or. 423 ( 205 Pac. 995, 1002 ).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.