State v. Ermels’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · Brady v. United States · 126 Wash. 2d 388 - State v. Ritchie · State v. Gore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant knew or should have known that the victim . . . was particularly vulnerable or incapable of resistance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ermels“the basis for and propriety of the imposition of an exceptional sentence upward,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ermels“real and material facts for purposes of this sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ermels
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.