Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 SO2D 242 - Snell v. Brown

Snell v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1962
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1171 (Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on State v. Ricks · Killian v. Craft · Thoman v. Grevemberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The machines involved are coin insertion machines and there is no skill exercised by the player in playing them. After the player deposits his initial coin or coins, it is possible for him to secure free games on the machines and it is possible for him to cash in these free games for an over-the-counter payoff because the record shows that these free games may be cancelled, erased and removed from the machines by merely pressing a button located in the rear of the machine. * * * * * * “The distinction at issue is the element of time necessary to convert these machines into automatic pay-offs. In the case at bar it takes up to 40 hours and perhaps less for a competent mechanic to do so. In the cases heretofore decided by the Supreme Court it took a matter of minutes to remove the plug in order to restore the machines to good working order. “We see no error in the opinion of the District Court and for these reasons the judgment is affirmed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.