Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 So. 2d 358 - Gable v. Miller

104 So. 2d 358 - Gable v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2019

6 state decisions

201958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hooks v. Bridgewater · Williams v. Bailey · Todd v. Hyzer · Battle, Et Vir. v. Butler · Rork v. Las Olas Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * we are of the opinion that had we found the proof of the existence and terms of the contract to be sufficient, we would nevertheless have been required to reverse the cause for lack of proof of the element of possession by plaintiff. See Williams v. Bailey, 1915, 69 Fla. 225 , 67 So. 877 , supra; Wilson v. Wilson, 1938, 132 Fla. 518 , 181 So. 385 ; Green v. Price, Fla.1953, 63 So.2d 337 ; 49 Am.Jur., Statute of Frauds, Sec. 521, and 37 C.J.S. Frauds Statute of § 252(a) (2).” (Emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[B]efore it becomes proper or necessary to determine whether the facts permit the enforcement of . . . a contract, as an exception under the Statute of Frauds, it must first be determined that the existence of the contract and the terms thereof have been established with both the quantum and the quality of evidence required under the applicable rules of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.