Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 So. 2d 785 - McNulty v. Cusack

104 So. 2d 785 - McNulty v. Cusack’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably 174 So. 2d 26 - Gulle v. Boggs (1965), 786 So. 2d 570 - Clampitt v. DJ Spencer Sales (2001)

2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

2001958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on O'Donnell v. United Electric Railways Co. · 162 Pa. Super. 495 - Meek v. Allen · Wright v. Clausen · Riccio v. Ginsberg · 82 So. 2d 158 - Townsend Sash Door & Lumber Company v. Silas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If the defendant had a justifiable reason for not observing traffic rules, then it was his duty to go forward with the evidence to show that he was not negligent and thus, permit the case to go to a jury for the jury's determination on conflicting theories or facts."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Whether the showing of a rear-end collision and the circumstances under which it occurred, in the absence of explanation, gives rise to a presumption of negligence so as to authorize a directed verdict, or whether it only gives rise to an inference of negligence sufficient for presentation to the jury."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.