Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 SO3D 1153 - Webb v. State

Webb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 3 So. 3d 1067 - Valdes v. State · 934 So. 2d 1167 - State v. Paul · 2 So. 3d 132 - State v. Meshell · Binns v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Webb was convicted of the same offense twice; therefore, the elements of these two convictions are the same. Our analysis then turns on whether the two convictions for lewd or lascivious molestation were part of the same criminal episode. If they occurred in the same episode, then Webb “may be convicted of only one offense for each episode.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.