Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 SW2D 136 - White v. Hix

White v. Hix’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 1948
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Steffian v. Milmo National Bank · Benson v. Phipps · Teagarden v. R. B. Godley Lumber Co. · The Texas Loan Agency v. Taylor · Markham v. Carothers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is thoroughly settled that one who claims a superior equitable title to land as against one who has purchased from the holder of the legal title must show that such purchaser did not purchase for value or purchased with notice of the outstanding equity. Teagarden v. R. B. Godley Lumber Co., 105 Tex. 616 , 154 S. W. 973 ; Commonwealth B. & L. Ass’n v. Howard (Tex. Civ. App.) 61 S. W. (2d) 546 ; Moore v. Humble Oil & Ref. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 85 S. W. (2d) 943 , 944; Tarkenton v. Marshall (Tex. Civ. App.) 91 S. W. (2d) 473 . The same rule applies in favor of lien holders. Texas Loan Agency v. Taylor, 88 Tex. 47 , 29 S. W. 1057 ; McAlpine v. Burnett, 23 Tex. 649 , 650.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.