Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 U.S. 171 - Porter v. Graves

Porter v. Graves’s Empirical Analysis

104 U.S. 171 · 1881

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2011

4 state decisions

2018811890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Mayor of Americus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To make a private bargain beforehand between the party who wishes to buy and the person authorized to sell, as to the price and other incidents of the contract, and then invoke the forms of a public sale with competition to give effect to the private bargain is a course of procedure well calculated to defeat the purpose for which the public sale is required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When the law requires a sale of property, real or personal, to be made at public auction, after due notice, it is for the purpose of inviting competition among bidders that the highest price may be obtained for what is sold.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “interested in having the property bring its full value,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.