Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 U.S. 520 - Ex parte Hagar

Ex parte Hagar’s Empirical Analysis

104 U.S. 520 · 1881

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
May 1959
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1959

6 federal appellate · 4 district ·

6018811890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte McNiel · Samuel Hobart v. Andrew Drogan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It has Iona been well settled that claims for pilotage fees are within the jurisdiction of the admiralty.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. The Queen

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.