Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 Vt. 34 - In Re Tomassi

In Re Tomassi’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
June 1976
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1976

6 state decisions

2019311940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Doyle · People Ex Rel. Taylor v. . Forbes · Dyke v. . Spargur · Janvrin v. Scammon · 37 Tex. Crim. 590 - Ex Parte Park

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Note. — After the opinions in this and the preceding case were prepared and the results announced, Doyle v. Hofstader, 257 NY. 244, 177 N.E. 489 , [ 87 A.L.R. 418 ], has come to hand. In that case, Chief Justice Cardozo, in his usual masterful way, discusses the whole subject of this constitutional privilege, and reaches conclusion in harmony with our decisions on the subject. We commend this opinion to the attention of the profession in this jurisdiction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.