104 Wash. 2d 497 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 89 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably 117 Wash. 2d 263 - State v. Smith (1991), State v. Dhaliwal (2003)
3 federal appellate · 89 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]ounsel are permitted latitude to argue the facts in evidence and reasonable inferences”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the defendant must show misconduct and resulting prejudice.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The defendant . . . raises this issue initially on appeal. He has shown no prejudice or any lack of understanding of the charge against him. The information was not unconstitutionally vague. It will not be considered on appeal. RAP 2.5(a); Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co., 91 Wn.2d 230 , 588 P.2d 1308 (1978).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.