104 Wash. App. 122 - State v. Sutherland’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 113 Wash. 2d 679 - State v. Leach · 73 Wash. 2d 616 - State v. Martin · 118 Wash. 2d 151 - State v. Hopper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to or death of any person ... shall give his name, address, insurance company, insurance policy number, and vehicle license number and shall exhibit his vehicle driver's license to any person struck or injured or the driver or any occupant of, or any person attending, any such vehicle collided with and shall render to any person injured in such an accident reasonable assistance, including the carrying or the making of arrangements for the carrying of such person to a physician or hospital for medical treatment if it is apparent that such treatment is necessary or if such carrying is requested by the injured person or on his behalf.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sutherland“So we turned back around and we went into town. Report of Proceedings at 117. Sutherland called 9-1-1 at Nolan's urging, identifying himself as Joe or John Johnson and explaining that someone had been hit on Cloquallum Road. But Sutherland told Nolan they could not go back to the scene because they had drugs in the car. The next morning Nolan and Sutherland went to a car wash where Sutherland power washed the underneath part of his truck. Nolan described the truck smell as”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sutherland“That said defendant, JEFFREY S. SUTHERLAND, in the County of Mason, State of Washington, on or about the 21st day of May, 1995, did commit FELONY HIT AND RUN, in that being the driver of a vehicle involved in an accident resulting in the death of Matthew Saeger, a human being, did fail to remain at the scene of the accident, contrary to RCW 46.52.020 and against the peace and dignity of the State of Washington.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sutherland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.