Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 WASHAPP 409 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Ross · New York v. Belton · United States v. Watson · Oliver v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are not protected from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment, Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 179 , 104 S.Ct. 1735 , 80 L.Ed.2d 214 (1984), article 1, section 7 allows individuals to protect their private affairs in open fields if they have”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “State v. Johnson, 75 Wash.App. 692, 707 , 879 P.2d 984 (1994). Johnson asks us to limit the scope of the emergency exception by adopting either a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “approach, Johnson proposes that the emergency exception would allow entry only if the officer”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.