104 Wis. 2d 700 - State v. Fillyaw’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

62 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'the disputed search and seizure has infringed on an interest of the defendant which the Fourth Amendment was designed to protect.'”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 106 Wis. 2d 503 - State v. Callaway · 2001 WI App 126 - State v. Trecroci

2. “(1) Whether one had a property interest in the premises; (2) Whether one is legitimately (lawfully) on the premises; (3) Whether one had complete dominion and control and the right to exclude others; (4) Whether the person took precautions customarily taken by those seeking privacy; (5) Whether the property was put to some private use; (6) Whether the claim of privacy is consistent with historical notions of privacy.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 159 Wis. 2d 1 - State v. Rewolinski · 114 Wis. 2d 206 - State v. Abramoff

3. “[i]t is not necessary to repeatedly recite the Miranda warnings during an investigation of the same person for the same crime.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 192 Wis. 2d 78 - State v. Jones · 2006 WI App 114 - State v. Backstrom