104 Wis. 2d 77 - State v. Rohl’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2012
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · 90 Wis. 2d 823 - Stanhope v. Brown County · 86 Wis. 2d 669 - Bank of Sun Prairie v. Opstein · 49 Wis. 2d 683 - Nicholas v. State · 91 Wis. 2d 14 - State v. Sarinske
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is within the discretion of the trial court whether to allow an amendment to the pleadings. Stanhope v. Brown County, 90 Wis. 2d 823, 834 , 280 N.W.2d 711, 715 (1979). The trial court's decision will not be reversed unless there has been a manifest abuse of discretion. Id. We believe it is also within the discretion of the trial court whether to allow an amendment to a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to sec. 974.06, Stats.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sutton“original, supplemental or amended motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.